Repository Audit
Audit refreshed: 2026-07-14
Summary
ARSVIN now has a professional public-repository foundation for an IEC 61850 Sampled Values engineering suite:
- GPL-3.0-or-later current community edition;
- separate negotiated commercial licensing path;
- preserved historical Apache-2.0 boundary;
- Publisher, Subscriber, and shared-engine architecture;
- deterministic tests and coverage gates;
- locked dependencies, vulnerability reporting, SBOM, checksums, and artifact attestations;
- CI, CodeQL, Pages, installer, and immutable release automation;
- structured issue and pull-request workflows;
- SEO-ready product site and searchable documentation; and
- operational, provenance, wording, and external-material controls.
Current strengths
- Clear scope: Sampled Values generation, reception, decoding, visualization, diagnostics, and evidence.
- Explicit distinction between transmitter evidence, receiver evidence, and IED behavior.
- Current-license and public-wording verification before build, Pages deployment, and release packaging.
- Separate Publisher and Subscriber applications using one shared engine.
- Release artifacts include current license, commercial notice, copyright, trademark, and third-party notices.
- Public fixtures are expected to be synthetic or documented as authorized and sanitized.
- Current claims avoid formal conformance, calibrated measurement, deterministic timing, functional-safety, cybersecurity, and IED-consumption guarantees.
Remaining priorities
- Expand deterministic coverage for live transport, scheduling, MMS/SCL edge cases, malformed traffic, and device-interoperability paths.
- Add additional independently sourced packet fixtures with documented provenance.
- Add Authenticode signing when a suitable certificate and operational process are available.
- Maintain evidence labels that distinguish automated tests, loopback, laboratory devices, and approved commissioning environments.
- Perform a contributor, employment, invention-assignment, confidentiality, trademark, and private-artifact review before a high-value commercial agreement.
Scope limitations
Repository inspection cannot prove ownership of every off-repository artifact or resolve employment and contractual obligations. Git account attribution is evidence of activity, not by itself conclusive legal ownership.
See External IP and Provenance Review, Public Wording and Claim Review, and Licensing.
GPL-3.0-or-later community documentation. Commercial terms require a separate agreement.Review this page on GitHub →